Gregg Wallace Suing the BBC for ‘Distress and Harassment’ Following Sacking
Gregg Wallace’s Legal Battle Against the BBC Over Personal Data and Dismissal
Gregg Wallace, the well-known former presenter of the popular cooking show MasterChef, has initiated legal action against the BBC and its subsidiary, BBC Studios Distribution Limited, citing distress and harassment following his dismissal in July. The 60-year-old television personality is pursuing damages of up to £10,000, alleging that the BBC failed to provide him with access to his personal data as required by law.
This lawsuit emerges in the wake of a commissioned report by Banijay UK, the production company behind MasterChef, which upheld several historical accusations against Wallace. These allegations primarily involved the use of inappropriate language and humour, with one claim concerning unwanted physical contact. Wallace has publicly suggested that his recently diagnosed autism may have influenced his behaviour.
Background of the Allegations and BBC’s Response
The report’s findings led to the BBC terminating Wallace’s contract, stating that his conduct did not align with the corporation’s values. The BBC acknowledged that more could have been done earlier to address the issues. Alongside Wallace, MasterChef co-host John Torode was also dropped from the show after an investigation upheld an allegation that he used an “extremely offensive racist term.” Torode has denied recollection of the incident.
Despite the dismissals, the BBC proceeded to air the latest series of MasterChef during the summer, featuring both Wallace and Torode, as the show had been filmed prior to their departures.
Details of the Subject Access Requests and Alleged Data Withholding
Central to Wallace’s lawsuit are subject access requests (SARs) he submitted to both the BBC and BBC Studios on March 6, seeking access to his personal data related to his work, contractual relations, and conduct. Under the UK General Data Protection Regulation (UK GDPR), organizations must respond to SARs within one month, though extensions are permissible for complex requests.
According to court documents, the BBC apologized on August 7 for delays in processing Wallace’s requests and assured him they were taking steps to expedite the process. However, Wallace claims he has yet to receive a full response.
More controversially, BBC Studios allegedly withheld parts of Wallace’s personal data, citing “freedom of expression” as justification. His legal representative, barrister Lawrence Power, argues that this redaction was unlawful and that the defendants failed to comply fully with their statutory duties under data protection laws.
Legal Claims and Potential Outcomes
Wallace’s claim includes seeking damages for distress, harassment, and loss of amenity, not exceeding £10,000, as well as interest. He is also requesting a court order compelling the BBC and BBC Studios to comply fully with his subject access requests.
The BBC and BBC Studios have not yet filed a formal defence and have declined to comment on the ongoing legal proceedings. This case highlights critical issues around data privacy rights, transparency, and accountability within major media organizations.
Conclusion
Gregg Wallace’s lawsuit against the BBC underscores the importance of data protection compliance and the impact of workplace investigations on public figures. As this case unfolds, it will be closely watched for its implications on how broadcasters handle personal data and respond to allegations of misconduct. If you want to stay informed about this developing story and other media-related legal battles, make sure to subscribe to our newsletter for the latest updates and expert analysis.
